43. Too much gratuitous violence, not enough Tao…

I just visited a Barnes & Noble bookstore for a nice, lazy weekend afternoon of book browsing. However, I didn’t look at many martial arts books or magazines. I glanced at a few, but spent more time browsing in the pet, woodworking, and new fiction sections. Why? I guess I just think there’s too much emphasis on gratuitous violence in many of those publications for me.

…That’s pretty odd, you might think, considering that I have spent over four decades training in various martial arts, huh? That’s the paradox at the heart of East Asian martial arts, I think. And it goes to the root of an essential aspect of such traditional arts that many modern practitioners simply fail to grasp. The martial arts were developed to a high degree of technical efficiency in those East Asian countries, but they carried with them a huge warning sign. To celebrate one’s ability to wreak destruction on others was considered ill-omened, and would lead to eventual disaster, like having overbearing pride, or hubris, in Greek thought, which would lead to one’s downfall by the gods.

Perhaps, in an imperfect world, martial strength is necessary for self-survival of oneself or a body politic. But it should not be a cause for arrogance or celebration. It should be treated as a necessary skill, a method of cultivating one’s mind, body and spirit, not so much a way to dominate others as a way to heal oneself and to survive and save others.

The Tao Te Ching, the first written treatise on Taoism, notes:

Sharp weapons are inauspicious instruments.
Everyone hates them.
Therefore the man of the Tao is not comfortable with them.

In the domestic affairs of the gentleman
The left is the position of honor.
In military affairs the right is the position of honor.
Since weapons are inauspicious instruments, they are not the instruments of the gentleman
So he uses them without enjoyment
And values plainness.

Victory is never sweet.

Those for whom victory is sweet
Are those who enjoy killing.
If you enjoy killing, you cannot gain the trust of the people.

On auspicious occasions the place of honor is on the left.
On inauspicious occasions the place of honor is on the right.
The lieutenant commander stands on the left.
The commander-in-chief stands on the right.
And they speak, using the funerary rites to bury them.

The common people, from whom all the dead have come
Weep in lamentation.
The victors bury them with funerary rites.

(Translation from the mindgazer.org web site)

Certainly, in China and Japan, there were warriors who boasted of their prowess in an overbearing manner. There were leaders who thought nothing of using their military strength to pillage, plunder and subdue the weak and innocent. But in all ages, the epitome of a true bugeisha (martial artist) of the highest order was that of a person with exemplary technical skills, but also with a gentle, humane nature, literate, skilled in the arts, and compassionate as well as truthful and just.

The great sadness I have is that most popular publications about martial arts nowadays, however, pay short shrift to the attainment of those more humanistic attributes, and instead concentrate on technical skill, the aggrandizement of personalities, or supposedly sure-fire ways to instigate violence and mayhem in the name of “martial arts.” Rather than cultivating a gentle mind, such publications tend to celebrate violence and egotism.

Consider, instead, what the Tao Te Ching says about seeking after worldly possessions or power as ends in themselves:

Coming into life and entering death,
The followers of life are three in ten.
The followers of death are three in ten.
Those whose life activity is their death ground are three in ten.
Why is this?
Because they live life grasping for its rich taste.

Now I have heard that those who are expert in handling life
Can travel the land without meeting tigers and rhinos,
Can enter battle without being wounded.
The rhino has no place to plant its horn,
The tiger has no place to place its claws,
Weapons find no place to receive their sharp edges.

Because he has no death-ground.

As one acquaintance of mine noted, one of the really wonderful movies that depicted such an ideal was Twilight Samurai,  starring Sanada Hiroyuki. The title comes from the main character’s nickname. He works in a low-level, low-paying accounting position, keeps to himself, is humble in spirit, and spends most of his spare time taking care of his family. A widow, he takes on menial side jobs to make enough money for his children, without complaint or excuses. He doesn’t go out drinking and boasting, so his co-workers, fellow samurai, think he’s a bit “dark” and “boring,” hence the nickname they call him behind his back, “Tasogare Seibei,” or “Seibei, the Dark (twilight),” i.e., not too bright.

Yet, when one of his friends is forced into a duel, Seibei tries to stop the violence, revealing himself to have been an outstanding student of swordsmanship. Using just a short branch, he knocks out his friend’s sword-wielding braggart…and apologizes for hurting the belligerent samurai, to boot.  That incident surprises everyone in the clan, and sets into motion a climactic battle scene in which he again must use his martial skills, unwillingly, to end a major incident that could spell ruin for the clan.

The theme of the “hidden” or humble martial arts master is a common one in many Chinese and Japanese movies, if you think about it. In the classic Kurosawa Akira movie, Seven Samurai, the leader of the band of idealistic samurai, upon meeting an old companion, can only talk about how scared they were in their last losing battle. That certainly didn’t give the villagers who hired them much confidence in their abilities, but they turned out to be heroic, skilled, daring…but very pragmatic, as warriors ought to be.

In another of Kurosawa’s movies, Redbeard (Akahige), a medieval doctor (Mifune Toshiro) wants to take a sick girl from a brothel to his clinic for treatment. The brothel owner calls on her bodyguards to beat him up. He tries to convince them not to fight, but they refuse to let the sick girl go, so he shrugs and says, “Well, it can’t be helped.”

The fight scene, short and swift, is one of the most brutal, vicious and realistic-looking movie versions of grappling-style fighting I ever saw, bar none. As a traditional doctor, Dr. Redbeard is a skilled bonesetter. So he uses his knowledge to dislocate his attacker’s limbs, one after another.

After the fight, he kneels over his erstwhile attackers and pops their limbs back into place, and tells his assistant, “Not good. I think I overdid it.”

Those examples were brought to mind a couple of months ago when I was training in my home dojo in Kyoto. We were learning short dagger defenses against a long sword. The beginning “stance” is basically simply standing at ease, knees slightly bent. I assumed the bent knees were mainly for “spring,” to allow you to move very quickly when the attacker came at you.

My teacher told another student that essentially, that was the reason for the flexed knees. But he added, “You also want to make yourself look deceptively smaller and therefore weaker. Then you know he’ll come at you with a particular attack, head on, because he thinks he can crush you easily. If you look too large and powerful, he might come at you in a more deceptive manner and you might not be able to adjust quickly enough.”

After watching us for a while, our sensei continued his explanation, “You are all martial artists, so it’s easy to look tough and strong. But it’s not so easy to look weak and unassuming. And that’s what you SHOULD look like. Never show your enemy your true face. Always deceive him. And that’s not so easy, because as martial artists, you have been striving to NOT look weak. But you must appear so outwardly.”

He was right. When I tried to teach the forms back in my own dojo, boy, did my own students have a hard time with appearing weak. One even fell over when he bent his knees and the sword stroke came at him. It was that hard to appear outwardly weak but to be internally strong.

And for myself, I think I’m only now beginning to grasp the concept, even after years of martial arts. Tai chi ch’uan stresses that you should be soft outside, strong inside with chi. Judo stressed suppleness. Jujutsu also stresses flexibility, which can be mistaken for “weakness.” Aikido stressed not meeting force on force, but redirecting and deflecting the attacker’s force. In all such arts, being outwardly supple and yielding while having one’s chi or ki strong is the essence of the techniques. And beyond techniques, it’s being strong inside but not belligerent outwardly. It’s being a gentleman, in the old Confucian or British sense of a gentle, humane individual.

I can’t say that I “get” the idea fully. I’m still learning, but I think, at least, I see the path ahead of me. I know what to aim for. And it’s not the stuff I see in a lot of popular martial arts publications in the local bookstore.

As the Tao Te Ching also says:

If you used the Tao as a principle for ruling
You would not dominate the people by military force.

What goes around comes around.

Where the general has camped
Thorns and brambles grow.
In the wake of a great army
Come years of famine.
If you know what you are doing
You will do what is necessary and stop there.

Accomplish but don’t boast
Accomplish without show
Accomplish without arrogance
Accomplish without grabbing
Accomplish without forcing…

…Occult abilities are just flowers of the Tao
And the beginning of foolishness.

Therefore the Master dwells in the substantial
And not in the superficial.
Rests in the fruit and not in the flower.

So let go of that and grasp this.

Or, as another wise man once said, blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the Earth.


9 thoughts on “43. Too much gratuitous violence, not enough Tao…

  1. Excellent post!

    For myself, I live and work in what are considered safe neighborhoods. I don’t hang around in bars, or with dodgy people. I don’t get publicly drunk or hang around with others to do. I haven’t been in a fight in over 30 years.

    The overriding purpose of my martial arts training is to help cultivate a calm, clear mind. I find applications for having a calm mind sprouting up every day.

  2. Rick and Chuck,
    Thanks. I wasn’t sure about this post, actually, since I dashed it off so quickly after my bookstore visit and making dinner. I really was thinking of a more technical exposition on timing, but I kept asking myself on the drive home, “Why don’t I read more of those martial arts books or magazines???”

    …I actually have a pile of books at home already, for one, mostly in Japanese, on historical and/or technical aspects of martial arts. It would take me months to go through those books even if I tried to read them one after another. And secondly, I ended up with the above conclusion. A lot of mainstream publications don’t interest me much.

    …A side note: the Tao Te Ching, some commentators say, should be read as a tract for those in leadership roles. It is the emotive, right-brain, metaphysical counterpart to the Confucian Analects for the Chinese scholar. But as one Chinese student of Confucius told me, together they can also be the foundation for a balanced personal philosophy as well, not just as a philosophy of governance. They balance each other out, creating a middle path between ritual observance and metaphysical flights of idealism.

    …Anyway, I digress…

  3. I think the difference is that the actual “death” has been removed from it….For most they are “arts of life.”

    Probably inevitable, but when you are in that cocoon and you are never in a position to have to harm someone – not in a match or in practice, but actually hurting another human being, or face being harmed or killed yourself – a certain emotional/moral dimension just never enters into the picture.

    It is all a sort of ‘game’ unless a teacher has really been able to transmit that element of death.
    Not in the romantic, vague way that some talk about. In the direct way that people that did and do such things are intimately familiar with.

    Sport martial artists just never think about it – they don’t need to, it is entirely removed from regular training, what they do IS a game, though some take it too seriously.

    Unfortunately my experience has showed me that some in the “combat” martial arts communities – modern and traditional – seem to think its all kind of “cool” to be talking about cutting people up, ex-sanguinating them, breaking people’s bones, gouging eyes out and the proper way to do it (because naturally they have so much experience doing so….). They go through drills of these things and appear to be playing for an imaginary camera in their heads, or to some sort of bizarre fantasy that “killing is by the numbers.” Just go to Youtube to see this – and don’t think because it happens to be a respected instructor that this may not be going on….

    I have experienced respected names in some martial circles do things, say things, and act in ways I found repugnant not because it was about killing, but because they treated it so lightly and superficially and credulously as if it was all some kind of performance art. Listening to students of some of these folks prattle on about things like “Spec Ops” and “Killing People” said a lot about the kinds of “entertrainment” going on out there in the combat arts.

    It certainly bears little resemblance to the professionalism and matter-of-fact candor of the actual military, LE, and spec ops folks from both realms I have had the privilege to work with both training and operating. At least the ones who are professional and well adjusted. There is a certain way about them that can be mistaken for the kind of thing noted above, but when you walk in their circles you get that it has a different tone than the wannabe commandos.

    Things take on a more serious note among the latter group. Questions like “rules of engagement” and “use of force law,” “threat discrimination” and “force articulation” come up because they are very real concerns, and no one wants to be the guy that killed someone by mistake or that did not absolutely need to be killed not because it “doesn’t matter” or its “all a game” but because it is not professional.

    Its why I don’t teach minors (in other words anyone under 18) and vet my CQC students very carefully, and have barred entry to some. We address serious concerns as to when you may actually harm someone and even kill them and how you need to articulate it, and how you’ll need to live with yourself afterwards for doing it so the decision best be a good one.

    Good post pointing to an element that is so neglected in almost all martial training.

  4. Maybe a bit too dramatic with “death,” I probably should have written “violence.”

    It is one area that I think a classical ethos in training has a relevance that eludes the combat sports and the more garish modern combatives. In the former, the ethics of violence are simply not discussed in sport, or discussed in a very odd way because it is an activity of artificial combat. In the latter, most practitioners are doing it to play-act, and it is so removed from their reality that play acting is all it will ever be. This leads to training that really goes off the rails some times, technically and well as ethically, because it becomes essentially the equivalent of a video game.

  5. Thank you, this has acted as guidance to an outsider.

    I have just become aware of perhaps the need to train in self-defence, and also the need to keep within the law. Just like old days, weapons for civilians are banned, so you have your hands and body and mind and common sense (ie: just dont be there).

    I have looked at Doormen talking online and they talk of this vicious interest in Cage Sports or Kav Magna, and I have asked…hold on, if you kill someone you will be arrested (if caught) and at least have to face Court for manslaughter….but they talk as if they can do as they like.

    I think the term is “Budo”? Not enough Budo in their morning breakfast?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s